tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32121011.post8242423794849027677..comments2023-06-30T18:45:33.972+03:00Comments on Marelles: European Politics: Laws, Memory, HistoryJean-Baptiste Perrinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00357296593091267312noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32121011.post-41980470004662522592006-10-18T18:14:00.000+03:002006-10-18T18:14:00.000+03:00I should have been more clear. Pamuk wrote about a...I should have been more clear. Pamuk wrote about a character which express himself about the Armenian genocide. This is what lead to the trial against him. But indeed, the Nobel Prize in this case was obviously given for the quality of his work, not so much his political positions. And that is the way it should be.Jean-Baptiste Perrinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357296593091267312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32121011.post-50150108069294308012006-10-17T17:41:00.000+03:002006-10-17T17:41:00.000+03:00As far as I'm concerned Pamuk didn't write anythin...As far as I'm concerned Pamuk didn't write anything on the Armenian Genocide.<br />One thing that concerns me much is that a highly esteemed prize in literature results more in political discussions rather than literary. In my opinion Pamuk should be discussed and praised for his literary achievements. Not that his performance in free speech be neglected, but that the prize is granted to him Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com